Home | Abstract | ADDIE | Kemp | IPISD | Conclusion | Multimedia Presentation | References

Welcome!

This is a collaborative project for EDTC 6321.01 of the University of Texas at Brownsville.  In this project, we will discuss the ADDIE paradigm and compare it with two instructional design models, which are the Morrison, Ross, and Kemp Model and the Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development Model.  We will also provide an example of how to proceed through each model and paradigm, using the topic of the solar system.  These are located in each model or paradigm links  The links above serve as a guide through our project, which also include our multimedia presentation, the conclusion, and project references.  

The following is a link showing our group efforts: Collaboration

Introduction

Instructional designers and teachers look toward instructional design models to help navigate through various instructional problems that frequent the educational field.  Such problems include, but are not limited to, how to tailor instruction to fit the learner's needs, what objectives will be included, how to develop a lesson, how to implement the unit, and what evaluation methods will be used to improve the instruction.  The ADDIE paradigm represents an overarching model that many other design models follow.  Both the Kemp Model and the Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development (IPISD) Model appear to have stemmed from the ADDIE paradigm and include elements of each phase of ADDIE.  However, these two models solve different problems and somewhat depart from ADDIE.  The following is an examination of these design models and will discuss their characteristics as well as their advantages and disadvantages, which may lead instructional designers and teachers to have a clearer picture of which model they may want to use in order to create and manage instruction.